Hermes vs Claude Code no Mesmo Navegador: Um VOOU, o Outro PIOROU

Author: Julio | Lucrar com IA · Watch on YouTube

Video authored by the channel shown, not by IANIA; all rights belong to the creator. Transcript and summary generated automatically; the original-language content is preserved.

Original language: English

Original video: Hermes vs Claude Code no Mesmo Navegador: Um VOOU, o Outro PIOROU · Channel: Julio | Lucrar com IA · 26:03 · Watch on YouTube

Topics: AI agents, Task and workflow automation, Cybersecurity and software security, Claude Code

Summary

The video compares Hermes and Claude Code using their built-in browsing versus Eagle Lite, a shared browser that can use an imported Chrome profile with saved logins and cookies. In two tests—researching X notifications and posting to a community, then finding a desktop computer on Amazon and adding it to the cart—Eagle Lite substantially improved Hermes’s completion and efficiency, while Claude Code generally performed better with its own browser setup. The presenter also emphasizes keeping agent credentials separate from personal accounts and says Eagle Lite centralizes browsing history across agents. The results are presented as tests of particular models, settings, and tasks rather than a universal performance claim.

Key points

The presenter says fresh browser sessions can force agents to log in repeatedly and handle CAPTCHA or two-factor authentication.
Eagle Lite is presented as a shared browser for multiple agents, with the option to import selected Chrome profile data, including cookies and logged-in sessions.
The presenter recommends using an agent-only Chrome profile rather than importing a personal profile, to limit exposure if an agent is compromised.
The first test asked agents to gather relevant AI news from X notifications and create a post in the presenter’s community.
Without Eagle Lite, Claude Code completed the first task in about 11 minutes; Hermes did not complete it during the roughly 28-minute attempt.
With Eagle Lite, Hermes completed the first task in about 23 minutes and used fewer tokens than in its unsuccessful first attempt; Claude Code took longer and used more tokens than with its own browsing setup.
The second test asked agents to find a professional desktop computer on Amazon and add the selected option to the cart without purchasing it.
In the second test, Hermes took 6 minutes 42 seconds without Eagle Lite and 2 minutes 48 seconds with it; Claude Code took 4 minutes 14 seconds without Eagle Lite and 8 minutes 47 seconds with it.
The presenter values Eagle Lite’s centralized browser history, which can help review agent activity, and notes that it is built on Chrome.

Chapters

Start	Chapter	Summary
00:00	The problem with agents browsing the web	The presenter introduces repeated logins and describes the goal of giving Hermes access to a persistent, logged-in browser.
01:01	Limitations of existing browser automation	He discusses session resets, subscription costs, brittle scripts, and the difficulty of managing browser profiles across several agents.
02:34	Introducing Eagle Lite and importing a profile	The presenter explains Eagle Lite’s multi-agent use and demonstrates importing an agent-only Chrome profile, while warning against using a personal profile.
04:39	Installation and connecting the agents	He walks through downloading Eagle Lite, importing selected Chrome data, and installing the browser skill for Hermes and the other agents.
07:14	First test without Eagle Lite	Hermes and Claude Code try to gather AI news from X and publish a community post using their usual browsing setups.
11:25	Repeating the first test with Eagle Lite	The agents repeat the X-to-community task with Eagle Lite, after which the presenter compares time and token use.
17:40	Second test: shopping on Amazon	The presenter asks both agents to research desktop computers and add a suitable option to the cart, first without Eagle Lite and then with it.
23:25	Results and final thoughts	He compares the Amazon test results, summarizes the differing outcomes for Hermes and Claude Code, and explains why he prefers a shared browser and separate agent credentials.

Quotes

I create a separation between my account and the agent’s account on purpose for security reasons. — 04:08

So, in terms of execution, there was an improvement compared to Hermes and a worsening compared to the clot. — 16:36

In general terms, Claud took more time and spent more tokens using Eagle Light. — 17:08

In the case of Hermes, we have a drop; it reduced the time by 58%, that is, more than half the time saved. — 24:28

having a single browser concentrating the work of all these agents — 25:00

Concepts and entities

Hermes, Claude Code, Eagle Lite, Chrome, X, Codex, Firecrawl, skill, Harness

Full transcript (original language)

00:00 If you’ve ever asked Hermiscud or even Codex to browse the internet for you, you’ve probably run into the same problem I did. They open a session from scratch with nothing logged in, and that’s why you always run into that caption screen, right, to confirm if it’s a human, a robot, and even two-factor authentication. Today I’m going to show you how I stopped dealing with this for free, giving Hermes access to a real browser, with login, cookies, everything optimized to make web browsing efficient and without needing to authenticate again for each

00:31 task. Look, I type barra/eagle trasser into Hermes and ask it to access my X account, which is already logged in, open the notifications tab and find posts with the latest and most relevant news about it. Then, with the compilation of this news, I ask it to create an informative post within Lucra com IA to generate value for our members. And the best part is that while it does this in a separate tab, I continue working normally, without it interfering with mine. Want to know how I did it? Then grab a pen and paper and

01:01 let’s get practical. A while ago I posted a video on the channel showing how to use FireCraw to give A agents more autonomy while they’re browsing the internet. But in that same video I identified two major limitations that I want to share with you here. The first is that each new session within FireCraw starts blank. We basically have to start the work from scratch. The other major issue, which was the primary reason I sort of set FireCraw aside, is the question of the cost. In addition to paying for my agent’s API, I also have to pay the monthly fee for the FireCraw plan, which isn’t cheap at

01:32 all. And the problems don’t stop there. Imagine the following scenario: you’ve automated your YMIS agent to go to a specific platform, retrieve certain information, and create a report, for example. For the Hermes agent to execute this process, it usually first reads the content of that page—all the HTML and CSS—identifies where each element is located, and creates a script that will then run automatically , so to speak. Why am I saying this? Because when an element changes position, the automation breaks the script, and you need to go back and

02:02 patch it, or even the Hermes agent will need to keep patching it, making it less efficient and wasting more tokens. In my case, since I run several agents —I have Hermes, I have Cloud Code, I also use Codex—I would like an option that concentrates all the activities of these agents, so I don’t have to create profiles for each of these agents separately. In short, less to manage, a single place with all the browsing history of these agents that is efficient. So, I hadn’t found this option until now, because that’s when I

02:34 discovered Egolite, which is a browser created for agents to execute automations on the internet more efficiently, faster, and at a lower cost. It’s compatible, folks, with most agents: Cloud Code, Codex. We even have them working simultaneously here: Codex , Cloud Code, Hermes in this other tab down here, Open Claw. You can also have your own tab working alongside the agents or leave it as a separate environment for only them to access; you can centralize all the history. Installation is super simple and quick.

03:05 We’ll see how to do it step by step. And a cool thing, folks, is that on the first use you can import everything from your Chrome browser into Eagle Lite with just one command, so that passwords, saved history, bookmarks, cookies, logged-in sessions, everything is imported and ready for your agent to use. It’s worth mentioning here, okay? All I’m talking about importing here, in this example I’m going to demonstrate, is this: if you have a

03:35 Chrome profile, like I do, dedicated to your agent, where the agent has their Gmail, passwords, everything saved, you simply transfer it from Chrome to Ego Lite. I don’t suggest you do this transfer if the profile is your personal one, unless your agents already work with their login and passwords, which I don’t recommend, right? But if you already do that, then you can import everything too. I prefer to keep them separate, because if the agent is hacked, for example, what will

04:08 leak are their credentials, the things I allow them access to. So I create a separation between my account and the agent’s account on purpose for security reasons. I suggest you do the same. Another cool thing, guys, is that with Eagle Lite, your agent will be able to perform several actions at the same time with just a few lines of JavaScript, with a single command that can already do multiple things. This is different from other options on the market, from other tools, where the agent needs to execute one thing at a time: execute, read, execute, read, and

04:39 so it takes longer and consumes more tokens, which doesn’t happen here with Eagle Lite. Now let’s install and connect it to Hermes and test it working together. I want to get Hermes and everyone else working. Now I’ll leave all the step-by-step instructions and links in the PDF organized for you to download. The link to access this PDF will be here in the description, the link to our community, “Lucrar Cunha”. Go there and download it for free. The first thing you’ll need to do is go to their website. I will also leave the first link in the description and in the pinned comment for you to download Inolite for free, which you

05:10 can find right here, okay? Also, if you access it through the link in the description and the pinned comment, you’ll be helping us out here on the channel. Let’s go. You enter the link and the first button here is the download button. You click on this button; at the moment it’s only available for Mac, okay everyone? So you click here to download it for free. Once downloaded, just open the installer, which will take you to this tab where it asks you to double-click the icon to install. You click on “get started,” and continue with the process

05:40 by clicking “next.” And here is the exact point where you can select which specific profiles you want to import from Chrome directly into Eagle Light. I have four profiles. I’m only going to import the one my agent uses. Okay, I’ve selected the profile that the agents already use. I’m only going to import that one and I’m going to click this button, “import data.” And this is the initial screen. And look how cool, it’s already opened all the tabs I had open in Chrome, okay? We had this tab open here, which is precisely his page,

06:12 and this other one here too, which is the download page. I had the Lucra tab here with the logo, with Jarvis’s profile, and I also had my X profile logged in. The next step before testing is to install the skill that’s here on GitHub in their official repository. You just copy the link and give it to the Hermes agent. So I asked Hermes to install the skill, I put the link and sent the command. I’ll click execute and I’ll take the opportunity to ask Cloud to do this too. Cloud returned here informing that the skill had already been installed. As you can see,

06:42 he didn’t need to do anything. This is because in this case, from what we’re seeing, this skill is installed in the terminal, so any agent that has it installed will have access. To confirm that it’s available, just type barra , it already appears here, browser. Same thing if I go to Hermes, type barra, it already appears here for us, skill. And the same thing is showing up in the codex bar as well. Great. Now let’s do the test so we can compare the efficiency before and after using Eagle Light Browser. Let’s start the test

07:14 here on Hermes. I’ll also send it to the cloud. Log into my X account, open the notifications tab and find posts with the latest and most relevant news about AI. Then, with the compilation of this news, create an informative post within Lucrar com AI to generate value for our members, without using the skill here, Eagle Browser. So, I’ll send it here on Hermes. I started the timer, I’ll send it to the cloud as well. It’s already typed here. And let’s go. Well, my first challenge, as I mentioned to you at the start of this

07:44 video, is asking how the access to the X platform will work. So, manually, from here, I will also be sending the URL address that leads to our community . Let me see what Hermes is doing. I requested authorization. I’ll authorize it. It’s running here without a saved login in X, nothing on disk with that name. I’ll check. What is it checking? Community apped before asking, okay? It’s running its little things here. Let me authorize it. Go back to… Here’s the X screen. Here is the X screen. I think that I will have to open the browser here on the side. Maybe it…This here. Exactly. It’s

08:14 here, the browser. And it’s even giving me the option to import all cookies. I don’t know if I would also have the option to import specific ones by profile. Let’s log in and I’ll be right back. Login done here in the cloud. Let me go back to Hermes. It keeps asking me for authorization to execute commands. Hermes asked me for access to fill in the information and it’s here, logging into X. There’s two-factor authentication active, so it probably won’t be able to. The Cloud, at this

08:47 moment, is capturing notifications here . Great. Clicked the wrong button, Hermes. It’s here. It’s saying it’s going to map all the buttons. Remember what I said? Oh, and aim for the right thing. Okay. Time keeps ticking. Claudio has already moved on here. What is he asking me? I left the draft ready , sent as the file above. Before publishing, it needs you to confirm if the text is good or request adjustments . Tell me if you want me to access and publish it there. I’ll need you to log in to Scult as well. I’m not going to

09:19 review anything, I’m just going to ask him to post it. Claudio has already opened the community for me where he’s asking me to log in. Community login completed. Let’s go back to Hermes. Hermes still hasn’t managed to log in to X. Wow. Cloud is already here, look. Sonet already played, already created the post. Summary of the week in I. All in Portuguese. Perfect. It’s selecting here, look, because you have to select the category. I didn’t tell him what the category was. I think he might

09:51 choose. He chose and it went. The miserable guy is a genius. It’s here, look. General discussion. Post made. Wow, we have exactly 11 minutes. Exactly. That’s how long it took us to do this without Eagle Browser, Eagle Lite, right? Eagle Browser is the skill . Hermiss, where’s Hermes? Hermes, along with this PSIC V 4.1 Flash model, which are different models, okay everyone? That matters. I couldn’t access your X account. Honest diagnosis of what I tested, of what crashed. I asked Hermes to open the browser and

10:22 I’ll log in for him, which is what he should have, right, along with the model here, he should have asked me from the beginning, just like Cloud did . Okay, I logged in here on both platforms, on X and on Lucrar com A, as you can see. Or now he navigated to the notifications page. Now yes, I think it will work now. Great, he pulled all the posts from inside X and obviously there will be some overlap. He already signaled here, look, his community already has a post from 4 minutes ago. Summary of the week in A. Then he asked how I want to overlay it, go ahead. Oh,

10:53 now yes. Look, he opened the school here, compiled the content, is reading all the elements. As I told you, that is how it works and we are now able to see it happening in practice. He has to read everything to identify where to click, how to create the post. I’ll even expand a little more so you can see better. He couldn’t click on his own. He asked me to click. I clicked, he’s scanning everything here now. Look how cool. The editor opened the title/ body, identifying where to place each element to be able to make the post. Yeah, guys, unfortunately he couldn’t.

11:25 I changed the template here, including now I’m using GPTC 5.6 on medium and he couldn’t fill it in or make the post. We’re here at 27 minutes, almost 28. Now let’s compare, this time using IQ and also the Eagle Light browser. So, it’s already here. I’ve already called the skill, and I’ve also set the prompt correctly. Same model as before, at the same effort level, we’re going to send it now. Before sending, let me go back here and activate the timer again. It

11:56 was on Sonet high. First, I’ll keep Sonet high and now let’s check if there’s any difference. Here in the Eagle Browser, folks, you can already see three things happening. Look at this, man. Who’s running this? Jarves. Oh, but I don’t know which Jarves it is . It’s Hermes that’s running this. Four spaces, okay? So you understand the logic here. This space is what I’m personally using, right? Here, what’s surrounded by this blue is the agent. Hermes is moving forward, man. He’s

12:28 already recognized that he’s logged in. Claud, where’s Claud? I found some notifications. They’re both using it right now. They’re both using it. I just can’t tell who’s who, but that’s okay. Opening one of the sessions the agent is using, I can, look, do the takeover, that is, I took over, right? In case something is needed. Hermes with the deep sic here V 4.1 Flash was going to another place. He found it, he understood that the community would be inside X. Where is it? He was kind of

12:59 opening it here, look. Welcome, welcome to the community. Maybe he tried to create some kind of community inside X. I saw that here, I didn’t do the takeover, I simply went back and sent this. Done. Lucrar is a community in the school. Now he’s trying to find it. Okay, but he’s already moved faster this time. Now it’s opening there, look . Uh, let me go back, let me go back. It’s opening here. It gave an error. Oh , is he going to get hooked again? He asked me where, actually, where the community is located. Hermes is already

13:30 here, look. He joined the community, Hermos, this time he’s right there in front. I was even going to send the link here, but he found it on his own. And here’s Clud, now it was Clud here, look. I mean, why is he going back to X ? Okay, he went back to X to see what had already been posted in the community and not to replicate it. Clud attacked. Clud already attacked. Oh, no , no, he didn’t post it. Calm down, calm down. I’m emotional. He didn’t post it. What happened here is the following. He opened the previous post that was made by him using my profile in the first test. In this second test,

14:02 we’ll know the difference because the profile that’s logged in here is the agents ’profile, that is, it’s Jarvis. Then he stopped here, identified that a post already existed, asked me if I wanted him to duplicate it, if I wanted him to do a new search. Just so we can continue with the test, I’m going to ask him to post a duplicate. Hermes is currently still doing a new search. He didn’t ask me if I wanted to duplicate the post or not. He’s doing more searches here. Cloud is typing right now. Look at that. Great. He started

14:33 typing this one. This session hasn’t been used yet. Cloud Code is still running. He said he was going to click the post button, which is the publish button, but he’s been here for a while without any response. I checked and he posted 3 minutes ago and I hadn’t noticed. So we’ll have to take that time out of his timeframe. 3 minutes. Yes. My tab is in the browser here. I control it. Going back to the Cloud tab that he’s using, which is still running . Did something happen here? Did it

15:03 crash for some reason? It seems Cloud is updating here too. It updated. I think this is just to check if it actually went up, okay? But I already saw on my tab here that it went up. Hermes published the post. It’s checking the page now to see if it uploaded. So here’s the post that Hermes made. GDP from zero. Okay. It worked. Cloud finished. So we have time here from the cloud. Hermes also gave feedback. So I’m going to reset the count. Let’s go to the comparisons. I put it in a graph to make it easier for us to visualize. However, before we get

15:34 into the first parameter, which would be execution time, I need to make an observation for you. In the first test we did without Eagle Light here in Hermes, this was the chat, the session we used. And here, if you are able to observe where I am pointing with my mouse, we have 47 tokens per second. This session ran with this average of tokens per second. When we did the test using Eagle Light, it dropped to 12, okay? So we need to take that into consideration as well. The cloud is pretty stable, right? We can basically

16:06 consider the cloud’s time for both sessions as a standard and the actual result. In the first scenario, we have 100 Eagle Light tokens. Here, the Cloud takes 11 minutes, and then with the Eagle Light it took longer, 17 minutes. So, in this result, we can actually consider that there was a longer delay for the Cloud. It was more efficient with its own harness and internal browser in terms of execution time than using the Eagle Light. In the case of

16:36 Hermes, we have a decrease in execution time. In the first scenario, it didn’t complete the task, and it took 28 minutes because I stopped it, and with the Eagle Light browser, 23 minutes. So , in terms of execution, there was an improvement compared to Hermes and a worsening compared to the clot. Now let’s look at the tokens consumed. In the case of the Cloud, we have 118,800 tokens without the Eagle Light. And here, with the browser, we also have 174,000 tokens. So, once again, it proved to be more efficient using its

17:08 own harness than it was using the Eagle Light. In the case of Hermes, the difference is absurd, because Hermes didn’t consume, didn’t actually complete the task at the beginning. It spent an average of 9 million tokens without Eagle Light. With Eagle Light, this consumption dropped to approximately 1,240,000 tokens with the task completed. So we had a great improvement compared to Hermes. In general terms, Claud took more time and spent more tokens using Eagle Light.

17:40 Hermes showed an absurd improvement. It took less time, consumed fewer tokens as well, not to mention the fact that it actually managed to complete the task. Now let’s move on to the second test. For this test, we will ask each of the agents to log into Amazon and search for a desktop computer for professional use. And I’m giving them hypothetical uses for this computer. I’m asking them to do a full search, list the five most interesting options, and add the winner to the cart without

18:11 finalizing the purchase, because we don’t want to finalize the purchase. I’m also asking them not to use the Eagle Browser skill, nor the Eagle Light browser. Same prompt here with the Sonet High, in the case of Cloud and in the case of Hermes. This time I’m going to use the model that’s most at the same level as the Sonet, which would be the GPT 5.6 Terra High. We’ll also prepare the timer here. The prompt is the same. I’ll send it here on Hermes, activate it, and go back to Cloud and trigger it as well. Let’s see

18:44 what they can do, if they can actually add the product to the cart, what difficulties they encounter, and how long it will take them. Cloud here is already saying that it has decided who the winner is and that it will add the cart. Apparently, this is the winning option. The cart is empty. Hermes. Confirmed. I’m on the Titan Fusion page . I’m going to click add to cart. Hermes is already doing it here. Hermes added it, finished. Added to the cart. Let me register it here. And Clodem was added too. We can stop. Where’s the

19:16 checkmark? It’s there. Okay, okay, okay . Finished. Done, we have this first result. This time without using Eagle Light or the Skill. Let’s actually check if the cart was filled. In this case, we already have confirmation because I can see it in this preview. And in Hermes’ case, I’m going to ask him to open the cart for me. I didn’t ask him to open it in the preview, but the cart is empty. And let’s play his time here so he can go back, correct it , and we can count it correctly. He

19:47 finished here again. He said that, in fact, in my preview here it was zeroed out, but in the internal browser the PC had been added, which suggests that there is a difference, right, between the internal browser and this preview, which doesn’t make sense, because in this case we are running the test on Hermes, which is installed and running on the same machine as the desktop application. He asked me to log into my Amazon account so that he could add it after I logged into the session here on the account, which is not necessary because, in the case of the Cloud, he

20:17 added it and I don’t have any kind of login here. Let’s go to part two of this test now. This time using both the skill and the Eagle Light browser. It’s right here, the Eagle Browser bar is active. The prompt is exactly the same, except for the final part there, where it said not to use the browser or the Eagle Light skill. So we have here 5.6 GPT 5.6 Terra on high. In the cloud I also have Sonic 5 High, also with the skill already activated. I’m going to

20:47 start my stopwatch here and we’ll check if they’re both working. Let me go to the browser. For now, there’s only one tab, which is mine that I already had open. So it’s the human’s. Oh, it just opened, look. Both at the same time. Let’s see here. The worst part is that I can’t tell who’s who. The browsing speed seems very similar, at least up to this point, right? Both opened at the same time. Both entered the Amazon website at the same time. Here, look, both practically at the same time also

21:18 arrived at the computer section, right, the desktop section there. Let’s see how the performance will be this time. In the first case, Ernis couldn’t, even with GPT 5.6, he didn’t finish. He chose, but couldn’t add to the cart. Let’s see if it works this time. This time we have the test here with Hermes. Oh, Hermes is finished. Oh, I think it’s finished. Oops, oops. Wow, Erm finished first this time, he has a good

21:51 set of candidates. Cloud didn’t finish first this time. He’s still running here. So, this has always been Hermes’s . Let’s see if I’ll wait for Clud to finish. We’ll see if he actually added it. But I can already see here that he added it. Wow, man, the real one is over. It’s here, look. I already recorded his little time. Clud, Clud is here, he’s still working. It seems that now Clud chose his option, the winner, to add to the cart. He said here that he will add it without finalizing the purchase. Let me go back there so we

22:22 can check that. It’s here with the product open, but it’s coming. I think it’s already in the cart too. Let him finalize. The product page loaded correctly. I’m going to click on add to cart. He’s dealing with this popup here , look, of protection. Add axis protection. I don’t want any protection . And it says adding successfully. Header cable. It already shows. I’ll confirm by visiting the cart page. He went to the shopping cart page and confirmed. Oh, he added the wrong product. It says here that this time Sonet got stuck here, folks, with this popup, because he clicks to add to the

22:54 cart, he expects it to add directly, but this information appears asking you to purchase insurance, a coverage plan, etc. The item was successfully added as an upsell. Now he identified the upsell , rejected the offer. Where is it? He really rejected it. It worked. He succeeded. The cart was added here and he’s just going to confirm to close it and we’ll time it. He finished and closed the browser and delivered it here to us. Let’s pause his time. Oh my God, the screen froze. He lost, it

23:25 stopped. We have both times. We’re going to compare the results, but we can already see a difference. The tab here that Hermes used is still open and we can see that he actually managed to add the item to the cart this time. Here, folks, are the results of this second round of tests with and without Eagle Light. Let’s look at the results. And it seems history repeated itself. Without Eagle Light, Cloud took 4 minutes and 14 seconds, spending 175,000 tokens. It took 8 minutes 47,

23:57 using 2,240,000 tokens in total. Hermes , in turn, spent 6 minutes and 42 seconds and 3.8 million tokens without Eagle Light. And with Eagle Light, it spent 2 minutes and 48 seconds, a drop of less than half the time, and also spent 1.8 million tokens, saving a lot. What changed with Eagle Light? Cloud became slower. So, apparently, Cloud is more efficient with its own harness than with Eagle Light. We have here more than double the time, consuming

24:28 about 12, almost three times more tokens with igolite active. In the case of Hermes, we have a drop; it reduced the time by 58%, that is, more than half the time saved. And token consumption also dropped by half, 53% with Egolite active. That was the result, folks, of our two tests using Hermes and Cloud. If you’re interested in me doing more tests with Eagle Light , maybe this time involving Codex Cursor and OpenC, comment below so I know. As I mentioned at the beginning

25:00 of the video, Wagite makes perfect sense to me because, number one, I already have a Chrome profile with all the agent logins and passwords separate from mine, which gives me security and peace of mind for them to only work with what I’ve given them access to. And, since I use several different agents, having a single browser concentrating the work of all these agents and also giving me the possibility to easily consult the history, in the same way I would consult it in Chrome, so that later, if I want to, for example, do an audit, check what the agent accessed on a

25:31 certain date, I have everything easy and organized for me. Ololite is built on top of Chrome, which is the base of Google Chrome. So there is no learning curve at all, in the event that you also want to use the browser. For those of you who want to try Eagle Light for free and no longer need to constantly log into platforms and systems so we can work and do something useful for you, the link to access it will be in the description. Download, install, use it and tell me what the result was and what performance you got. If you liked

26:03 the content, leave your like on the video, subscribe to our channel so we can continue bringing cool videos like this to you and I’ll see you here, in the next video.